AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 47% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 612 MHz
  • 4x more pipelines: 512 vs 128
  • 2.5x better floating-point performance: 952.3 gflops vs 387.1 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
  • 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 171 Watt
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
  • 4.3x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1080 MHz
  • Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 388 vs 252
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1420 vs 643
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 December 2013 vs 2 May 2007
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 612 MHz
Pipelines 512 vs 128
Floating-point performance 952.3 gflops vs 387.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 90 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 171 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 4600 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 388 vs 252
PassMark - G3D Mark 1420 vs 643

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra

  • Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 39.2 billion / sec vs 29.76 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate 39.2 billion / sec vs 29.76 GTexel / s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
388
252
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1420
643
Name AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
PassMark - G2D Mark 388 252
PassMark - G3D Mark 1420 643
Geekbench - OpenCL 40722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3112
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3168
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Tesla
Code name Cape Verde G80
Launch date 21 December 2013 2 May 2007
Place in performance rating 612 615
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $829

Technical info

Boost clock speed 930 MHz
Core clock speed 900 MHz 612 MHz
Floating-point performance 952.3 gflops 387.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 90 nm
Pipelines 512 128
Texture fill rate 29.76 GTexel / s 39.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 171 Watt
Transistor count 1,500 million 681 million
CUDA cores 612

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 2x 6-pin
Length 270 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 73.6 GB / s 103.7 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 4600 MHz 1080 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3

Technologies

SLI