AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 612 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 512 vs 128
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 952.3 gflops vs 387.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 171 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.3x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 388 vs 252
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1420 vs 643
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 2 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 612 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops vs 387.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 171 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 vs 252 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1420 vs 643 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 39.2 billion / sec vs 29.76 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 39.2 billion / sec vs 29.76 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 | 252 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1420 | 643 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3112 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3112 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Cape Verde | G80 |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 2 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 612 | 615 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $829 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 930 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 612 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | 387.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 29.76 GTexel / s | 39.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 171 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 681 million |
CUDA cores | 612 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 270 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 103.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1080 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
SLI |