AMD Radeon R9 270X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 270X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1152
- Around 13% better floating-point performance: 2,688 gflops vs 2,378 gflops
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4869 vs 4803
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 613 vs 532
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 63.87 vs 37.505
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1314.72 vs 864.402
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.354 vs 3.09
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 85.21 vs 40.457
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 315.412 vs 84.186
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8068 vs 6927
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8068 vs 6927
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1772 vs 1659
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 25 June 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 1152 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,688 gflops vs 2,378 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4869 vs 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 613 vs 532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.87 vs 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.72 vs 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.354 vs 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 vs 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.412 vs 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8068 vs 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8068 vs 6927 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1772 vs 1659 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 84 GTexel / s
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 180 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 270X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 270X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4869 | 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 613 | 532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.87 | 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.72 | 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.354 | 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 | 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.412 | 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8068 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8068 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1772 | 1659 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14261 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 270X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Curacao | GK104 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 25 June 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $249 |
| Place in performance rating | 440 | 576 |
| Price now | $399 | $249.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | 23.69 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,688 gflops | 2,378 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1152 |
| Stream Processors | 1280 | |
| Texture fill rate | 84 GTexel / s | 94.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1152 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 270X with others
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GTX
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
AMDFirePro W8000
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
AMDFirePro S10000
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
AMDRadeon HD 8830M
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
AMDRadeon R9 285
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
NVIDIAP106-100
