AMD Radeon R9 270X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 270X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 888 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1152
- Around 31% better floating-point performance: 2,688 gflops vs 2,046 gflops
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 33% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1772 vs 1333
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 27 June 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 888 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 1152 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,688 gflops vs 2,046 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1772 vs 1333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 84 GTexel / s
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 180 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 85.25 GTexel / s vs 84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 270X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 270X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4869 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 613 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.87 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.72 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.354 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.412 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8068 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8068 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1772 | 1333 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11782 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 270X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Curacao | GK104 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 27 June 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 440 | 854 |
| Price now | $399 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 888 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,688 gflops | 2,046 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1152 |
| Stream Processors | 1280 | |
| Texture fill rate | 84 GTexel / s | 85.25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 270X with others
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800 GTX
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
AMDFirePro W8000
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
AMDFirePro S10000
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
AMDRadeon HD 8830M
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
AMDRadeon R9 285
AMDRadeon R9 270X vs
NVIDIAP106-100
