AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5725

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 285 and ATI Mobility FireGL V5725 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R9 285

ATI Mobility FireGL V5725

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 35% higher core clock speed: 918 MHz vs 680 MHz
18.9x more texture fill rate: 102.8 GTexel / s vs 5.44 GTexel / s
14.9x more pipelines: 1792 vs 120
20.2x better floating-point performance: 3,290 gflops vs 163.2 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
3.4x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
30.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 219
Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 405

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 September 2014 vs 1 January 2009
Core clock speed	918 MHz vs 680 MHz
Texture fill rate	102.8 GTexel / s vs 5.44 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1792 vs 120
Floating-point performance	3,290 gflops vs 163.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 55 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6680 vs 219
PassMark - G2D Mark	597 vs 405

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 285
GPU 2: ATI Mobility FireGL V5725

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6680

219

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

597

405

Name	AMD Radeon R9 285	ATI Mobility FireGL V5725
PassMark - G3D Mark	6680	219
PassMark - G2D Mark	597	405
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	72.799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1474.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	91.954
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	391.399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2782
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6474
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2782
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2778

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 285	ATI Mobility FireGL V5725
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	TeraScale
Code name	Tonga	M86
Design	AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch date	2 September 2014	1 January 2009
Launch price (MSRP)	$249
Place in performance rating	445	388
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	918 MHz	680 MHz
Floating-point performance	3,290 gflops	163.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	1792	120
Texture fill rate	102.8 GTexel / s	5.44 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	190 Watt
Transistor count	5,000 million	378 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	221 mm
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12	10.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	176.0 GB / s	25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)