AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 285 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

AMD Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
2.4x more texture fill rate: 102.8 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
2.8x more pipelines: 1792 vs 640
2.4x better floating-point performance: 3,290 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
1100x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 3901
Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 521
Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.799 vs 42.463
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1474.632 vs 642.715
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.369 vs 2.933
3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.954 vs 26.532
2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 391.399 vs 133.458
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6474 vs 4843
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6474 vs 4843
23.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2778 vs 117

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 September 2014 vs 18 February 2014
Texture fill rate	102.8 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1792 vs 640
Floating-point performance	3,290 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6680 vs 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	597 vs 521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	72.799 vs 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1474.632 vs 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.369 vs 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	91.954 vs 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	391.399 vs 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6474 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6474 vs 4843
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2778 vs 117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 918 MHz
3.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 190 Watt
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3043
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 2782
Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3043
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 2782

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1020 MHz vs 918 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 190 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 vs 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329 vs 2782
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 vs 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329 vs 2782

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 285
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6680

3901

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

597

521

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

72.799

42.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1474.632

642.715

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.369

2.933

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

91.954

26.532

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

391.399

133.458

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6474

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3043

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2782

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6474

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3043

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2782

3329

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

2778

117

Name	AMD Radeon R9 285	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	6680	3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	597	521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	72.799	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1474.632	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.369	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	91.954	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	391.399	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6474	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3043	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2782	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6474	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3043	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2782	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2778	117
Geekbench - OpenCL		11526

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 285	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Maxwell
Code name	Tonga	GM107
Design	AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch date	2 September 2014	18 February 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$249	$149
Place in performance rating	442	707
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Price now		$299.01
Value for money (0-100)		15.02
Technical info
Core clock speed	918 MHz	1020 MHz
Floating-point performance	3,290 gflops	1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1792	640
Texture fill rate	102.8 GTexel / s	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	190 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	5,000 million	1,870 million
Boost clock speed		1085 MHz
CUDA cores		640
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
VGA
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	221 mm	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	176.0 GB / s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA