AMD Radeon R9 285 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 285 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

AMD Radeon R9 285

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 285

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.8 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
2.8x plus de pipelines: 1792 versus 640
2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,290 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
1100x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5500 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
Environ 71% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 versus 3901
Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 versus 521
Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 72.799 versus 42.463
2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1474.632 versus 642.715
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.369 versus 2.933
3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.954 versus 26.532
2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 391.399 versus 133.458
Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6474 versus 4843
Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6474 versus 4843
23.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2778 versus 117

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	2 September 2014 versus 18 February 2014
Taux de remplissage de la texture	102.8 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1792 versus 640
Performance á point flottant	3,290 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
Vitesse de mémoire	5500 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	6680 versus 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	597 versus 521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	72.799 versus 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1474.632 versus 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.369 versus 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	91.954 versus 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	391.399 versus 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6474 versus 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6474 versus 4843
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2778 versus 117

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 918 MHz
3.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 190 Watt
Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3043
Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 versus 2782
Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3043
Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 versus 2782

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1020 MHz versus 918 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt versus 190 Watt
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 versus 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3329 versus 2782
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 versus 3043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3329 versus 2782

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 285
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6680

3901

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

597

521

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

72.799

42.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1474.632

642.715

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.369

2.933

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

91.954

26.532

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

391.399

133.458

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6474

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3043

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2782

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6474

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3043

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2782

3329

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

2778

117

Nom	AMD Radeon R9 285	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	6680	3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	597	521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	72.799	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1474.632	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.369	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	91.954	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	391.399	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6474	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3043	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2782	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6474	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3043	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2782	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2778	117
Geekbench - OpenCL		11526

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD Radeon R9 285	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentiel
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Maxwell
Nom de code	Tonga	GM107
Conception	AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Date de sortie	2 September 2014	18 February 2014
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$249	$149
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	442	707
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Prix maintenant		$299.01
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		15.02
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	918 MHz	1020 MHz
Performance á point flottant	3,290 gflops	1,389 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1792	640
Taux de remplissage de la texture	102.8 GTexel / s	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	190 Watt	60 Watt
Compte de transistor	5,000 million	1,870 million
Vitesse augmenté		1085 MHz
Noyaux CUDA		640
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
VGA
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI		Internal
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDCP
HDMI
Résolution VGA maximale		2048x1536
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	221 mm	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	2x 6-pin	None
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 3.0
Hauteur		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Soutien API
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	176.0 GB / s	86.4 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	256 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	5500 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé		0
Technologies
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA