AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 285 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 918 MHz vs 889 MHz
• Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 190 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 785.7x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 594
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1474.632 vs 1293.474
• 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.954 vs 22.384
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 391.399 vs 290.861

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 213 billion / sec vs 102.8 GTexel / s
• Around 61% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 1792
• Around 72% better floating-point performance: 5,645 gflops vs 3,290 gflops
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9047 vs 6680
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.988 vs 6.369
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8721 vs 6474
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 vs 3043
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2782
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8721 vs 6474
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 vs 3043
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2782
• Around 11% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3095 vs 2778

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 285
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6680 9047
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	597 594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	72.799 72.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1474.632 1293.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.369 7.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	91.954 22.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	391.399 290.861
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6474 8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3043 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2782 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6474 8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3043 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2782 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2778 3095

Compare specifications (specs)