AMD Radeon R9 285 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 285 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 285
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 918 MHz versus 889 MHz
- Environ 32% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 190 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 785.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5500 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1474.632 versus 1293.474
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.954 versus 22.384
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 391.399 versus 290.861
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 September 2014 versus 18 February 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 918 MHz versus 889 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 versus 595 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.799 versus 72.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.632 versus 1293.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.954 versus 22.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 391.399 versus 290.861 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 213 billion / sec versus 102.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 61% de pipelines plus haut: 2880 versus 1792
- Environ 72% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,645 gflops versus 3,290 gflops
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9039 versus 6680
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.988 versus 6.369
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8721 versus 6474
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 versus 3043
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 2782
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8721 versus 6474
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 versus 3043
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 2782
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3095 versus 2778
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 213 billion / sec versus 102.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 versus 1792 |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,645 gflops versus 3,290 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9039 versus 6680 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 versus 6.369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 versus 6474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 versus 3043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 2782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 versus 6474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 versus 3043 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 2782 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3095 versus 2778 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 285
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 285 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | 9039 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 | 595 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.799 | 72.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.632 | 1293.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.369 | 7.988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.954 | 22.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 391.399 | 290.861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 | 8721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3043 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2782 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 | 8721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3043 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2782 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2778 | 3095 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26079 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 285 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Tonga | GK110B |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 2 September 2014 | 18 February 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $249 | $999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 446 | 441 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $999.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.82 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 918 MHz | 889 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,290 gflops | 5,645 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2880 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.8 GTexel / s | 213 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 7,080 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2880 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 221 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 176.0 GB / s | 336 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 285 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 285 vs
ATIFireGL V3400
AMDRadeon R9 285 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 440
AMDRadeon R9 285 vs
ATIFirePro 2460 Multi-View
AMDRadeon R9 285 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 530v
AMDRadeon R9 285 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 6
AMDRadeon R9 285 vs
IntelUHD Graphics P750
