AMD Radeon R9 290 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 290 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800S videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 7.9x more texture fill rate: 151.5 GTexel / s vs 19.2 billion / sec
- 40x more pipelines: 2560 vs 64
- 25.3x better floating-point performance: 4,849 gflops vs 192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 13x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8256 vs 636
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 vs 427
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 November 2013 vs 15 July 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 151.5 GTexel / s vs 19.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 4,849 gflops vs 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8256 vs 636 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 vs 427 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 947 MHz
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 275 Watt
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 947 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 290
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 290 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800S |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8256 | 636 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 | 427 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102277 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.325 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1366.314 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.034 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 540.645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6300 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6300 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3694 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 290 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800S | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Hawaii | G94 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 5 November 2013 | 15 July 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 354 | 353 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 947 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,849 gflops | 192 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 151.5 GTexel / s | 19.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | VGAHDMISingle Link DVI |
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 275 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320.0 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |