Intel Arc A370M vs AMD Radeon R9 290
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A370M and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A370M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1550 MHz vs 947 MHz
- 866x more texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 151.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.9x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 167.171 vs 89.325
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1470.844 vs 1366.314
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.937 vs 10.034
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 vs 5 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1550 MHz vs 947 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s vs 151.5 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 167.171 vs 89.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1470.844 vs 1366.314 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.937 vs 10.034 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.765 vs 71.258
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 540.645 vs 482.549
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 775 vs 724
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8293 vs 5115
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 vs 29668
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3683 vs 3443
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1024 |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.765 vs 71.258 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 540.645 vs 482.549 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 775 vs 724 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8293 vs 5115 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102277 vs 29668 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3683 vs 3443 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A370M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc A370M | AMD Radeon R9 290 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 167.171 | 89.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1470.844 | 1366.314 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.937 | 10.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 71.258 | 98.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 482.549 | 540.645 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 775 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5115 | 8293 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29668 | 102277 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3443 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6300 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6300 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A370M | AMD Radeon R9 290 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | DG2-128 | Hawaii |
Launch date | 30 Mar 2022 | 5 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 361 | 360 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1550 MHz | 947 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,050 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s | 151.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,849 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 275 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 320.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |