AMD Radeon R9 370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 875 MHz
• Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 975 MHz vs 928 MHz
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 800x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 636
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 28360
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 336.491 vs 182.11
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3699
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3699

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

• 2.7x more texture fill rate: 210 billion / sec vs 78 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1280
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 5,345 gflops vs 2,496 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9509 vs 4722
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.429 vs 64.576
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 6096
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 6096

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4722 9509
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	781 636
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	75346 28360
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	64.576 75.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	336.491 182.11
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6096 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6096 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3342

Compare specifications (specs)