AMD Radeon R9 370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 72 billion / sec
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 2,413 gflops
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 800x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 673
- 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 18734
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 336.491 vs 200.825
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3335
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3335
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 22 January 2015 |
| Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s vs 72 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 1024 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops vs 2,413 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 vs 673 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 vs 18734 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 vs 200.825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3335 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1127 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6111 vs 4722
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 vs 64.576
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7218 vs 6096
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7218 vs 6096
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1127 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz vs 975 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6111 vs 4722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 vs 64.576 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 vs 6096 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 vs 6096 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4722 | 6111 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 | 673 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 | 18734 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 | 73.733 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 | 200.825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6096 | 7218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6096 | 7218 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 162 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.338 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 370 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Trinidad | GM206 |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 22 January 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 412 | 514 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Price now | $229.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 34.63 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 975 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1127 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 2,413 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1024 |
| Texture fill rate | 78 GTexel / s | 72 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2,940 million |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 221 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pins |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| SLI options | 2x | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 112 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
