AMD Radeon R9 370X vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370X and NVIDIA GRID K280Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 745 MHz
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 6555
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 1312
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 6555
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 1312
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 August 2015 vs 28 June 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 745 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops vs 2,289 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 vs 6555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 1312 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 vs 6555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 1312 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K280Q
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 82.4 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3562 vs 3348
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3562 vs 3348
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 82.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1280 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3562 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3562 vs 3348 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K280Q
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA GRID K280Q |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | 6555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 1312 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | 6555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 1312 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3562 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2840 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA GRID K280Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Trinidad | GK104 |
| Launch date | 27 August 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $1,875 |
| Place in performance rating | 543 | 544 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s | 95.36 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 370X with others
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
ATIRadeon X700 PRO
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4830
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAGRID K280Q
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
AMDRadeon R9 370X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560X
