AMD Radeon R9 380 vs AMD FirePro S9050
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 380 and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 108.6 GTexel / s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 3,476 gflops vs 3,226 gflops
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 190 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6089 vs 4901
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 652 vs 369
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1503.633 vs 1463.376
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7635 vs 7062
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7635 vs 7062
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 vs 7 August 2014 |
| Texture fill rate | 108.6 GTexel / s vs 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 3,476 gflops vs 3,226 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6089 vs 4901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 652 vs 369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 vs 1463.376 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7635 vs 7062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7635 vs 7062 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 68.324 vs 58.135
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 vs 3718
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 3359
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 vs 3718
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 3359
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 970 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.324 vs 58.135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6260 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13032 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6260 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13032 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 380 | AMD FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6089 | 4901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 652 | 369 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76397 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.135 | 68.324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1503.633 | 1463.376 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7635 | 7062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 6260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 13032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7635 | 7062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 6260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 13032 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2791 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.491 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.133 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 344.551 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 380 | AMD FirePro S9050 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Antigua | Tahiti |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 7 August 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 375 | 372 |
| Price now | $264.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 31.71 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 970 MHz | |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,476 gflops | 3,226 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1792 |
| Stream Processors | 1792 | |
| Texture fill rate | 108.6 GTexel / s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 4,313 million |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length Dual Slot | Full Height / Full Length |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 221 mm | 254 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 182.4 GB/s | 264 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 970 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 380 with others
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDFirePro S9050
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
AMDRadeon R9 380 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
