AMD Radeon R9 380X vs AMD FirePro W7000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 380X and AMD FirePro W7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 124.2 GTexel / s vs 76 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
- Around 63% better floating-point performance: 3,973 gflops vs 2,432 gflops
- Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 190 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6171 vs 4255
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 677 vs 539
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9685 vs 6475
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9685 vs 6475
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 November 2015 vs 13 June 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 124.2 GTexel / s vs 76 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 3,973 gflops vs 2,432 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6171 vs 4255 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 677 vs 539 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 vs 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 vs 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7000
- 4.9x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 970 MHz
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 970 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 380X | AMD FirePro W7000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6171 | 4255 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 677 | 539 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 | 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 | 6475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.467 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1148.367 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.472 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 268.49 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 380X | AMD FirePro W7000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Antigua | Pitcairn |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 19 November 2015 | 13 June 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $899 |
Place in performance rating | 309 | 502 |
Price now | $528.44 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 970 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,973 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1280 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 124.2 GTexel / s | 76 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2,800 million |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | Full Height / Full Length |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 221 mm | 242 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 182.4 GB/s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 970 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |