AMD Radeon R9 380X vs AMD FirePro W7000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 380X and AMD FirePro W7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 124.2 GTexel / s vs 76 GTexel / s
  • Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
  • Around 63% better floating-point performance: 3,973 gflops vs 2,432 gflops
  • Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 190 Watt vs 350 Watt
  • Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6171 vs 4255
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 677 vs 539
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9685 vs 6475
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9685 vs 6475
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 19 November 2015 vs 13 June 2012
Texture fill rate 124.2 GTexel / s vs 76 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2048 vs 1280
Floating-point performance 3,973 gflops vs 2,432 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 190 Watt vs 350 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6171 vs 4255
PassMark - G2D Mark 677 vs 539
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9685 vs 6475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9685 vs 6475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 vs 3359

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7000

  • 4.9x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 970 MHz
Memory clock speed 4800 MHz vs 970 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6171
4255
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
677
539
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9685
6475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9685
6475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3359
Name AMD Radeon R9 380X AMD FirePro W7000
PassMark - G3D Mark 6171 4255
PassMark - G2D Mark 677 539
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9685 6475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9685 6475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3053
Geekbench - OpenCL 17788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 52.467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1148.367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 85.472
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 268.49

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 380X AMD FirePro W7000

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Antigua Pitcairn
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date 19 November 2015 13 June 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $229 $899
Place in performance rating 309 502
Price now $528.44
Type Desktop Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 15.61

Technical info

Boost clock speed 970 MHz
Compute units 32
Floating-point performance 3,973 gflops 2,432 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2048 1280
Stream Processors 2048
Texture fill rate 124.2 GTexel / s 76 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 190 Watt 350 Watt
Transistor count 5,000 million 2,800 million
Core clock speed 950 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 4x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
VGA
DisplayPort count 4
StereoOutput3D

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support PCIe 3.0 PCIe 3.0
Form factor Full Height / Full Length Full Height / Full Length
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 221 mm 242 mm
Supplementary power connectors ​2 x 6-pin 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_1)
Mantle
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 182.4 GB/s 153.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 970 MHz 4800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore