AMD Radeon R9 380X vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 380X and AMD Radeon R9 M390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 124.2 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- Around 34% better floating-point performance: 3,973 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6153 vs 3851
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 671 vs 487
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9685 vs 6508
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9685 vs 6508
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 November 2015 vs 5 May 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 124.2 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 3,973 gflops vs 2,961 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6153 vs 3851 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 671 vs 487 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 vs 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 vs 6508 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 190 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3717
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3717
- 7.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 3361
- 7.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 3361
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8593 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8593 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 vs 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 vs 3361 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 380X | AMD Radeon R9 M390X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6153 | 3851 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 671 | 487 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 24690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 24690 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22044 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.199 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1284.053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.881 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 312.822 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 380X | AMD Radeon R9 M390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Antigua | Amethyst |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series |
Launch date | 19 November 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Place in performance rating | 310 | 311 |
Price now | $528.44 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 970 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,973 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 124.2 GTexel / s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 5,000 million |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 221 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 182.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 970 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Switchable graphics |