AMD Radeon R9 390 vs AMD FireStream 9250
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 390 and AMD FireStream 9250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 6.4x more texture fill rate: 160.0 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 800
- 5.1x better floating-point performance: 5,120 gflops vs 1,000.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 7.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8910 vs 1165
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 465
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 June 2015 vs 16 June 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 160.0 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 800 |
Floating-point performance | 5,120 gflops vs 1,000.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8910 vs 1165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 vs 465 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9250
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 99% higher memory clock speed: 1986 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 390
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 390 | AMD FireStream 9250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8910 | 1165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 | 465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43795 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 120.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.097 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.381 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10445 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10445 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3949 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 390 | AMD FireStream 9250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Grenada | RV770 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 16 June 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Place in performance rating | 307 | 305 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Compute units | 40 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,120 gflops | 1,000.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 800 |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 160.0 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 956 million |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 275 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 63.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 512 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1986 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |