AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon R9 390
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT and AMD Radeon R9 390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 85% higher boost clock speed: 1845 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 1015x more texture fill rate: 162.4 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 14x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9137 vs 8910
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 44559 vs 43795
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 128.135 vs 120.267
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.328 vs 11.097
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.474 vs 116.473
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 742.778 vs 607.381
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11075 vs 10445
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11075 vs 10445
- Around 24% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4910 vs 3949
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Dec 2019 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 162.4 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9137 vs 8910 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44559 vs 43795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 vs 120.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 vs 11.097 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 vs 116.473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 vs 607.381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 vs 10445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 vs 10445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 vs 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4910 vs 3949 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390
- Around 82% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1408
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 777
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3164.164 vs 2024.814
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 vs 777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 vs 2024.814 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9137 | 8910 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 777 | 797 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44559 | 43795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 128.135 | 120.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2024.814 | 3164.164 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.328 | 11.097 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.474 | 116.473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 742.778 | 607.381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11075 | 10445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11075 | 10445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 | 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4910 | 3949 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT | AMD Radeon R9 390 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Grenada |
Launch date | 12 Dec 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $329 |
Place in performance rating | 304 | 307 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 324.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.39 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.196 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.04 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 162.4 GTexel/s | 160.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,120 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 7.09 inches (180 mm) | 275 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 512 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |