AMD Radeon R9 390X vs AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 390X and AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 184.8 GTexel / s vs 58.8 GTexel / s
- 3.1x more pipelines: 2816 vs 896
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 5,914 gflops vs 1,882 gflops
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11675 vs 4551
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11675 vs 4551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 vs 2 September 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 184.8 GTexel / s vs 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2816 vs 896 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,914 gflops vs 1,882 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11675 vs 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11675 vs 4551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6886 vs 3706
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17482 vs 3350
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6886 vs 3706
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17482 vs 3350
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 275 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6886 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17482 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6886 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17482 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 390X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 390X | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9363 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.288 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.947 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 683.568 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11675 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 17482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11675 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 17482 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 390X | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Grenada | Bonaire |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 2 September 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $429 | |
| Place in performance rating | 269 | 271 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Compute units | 44 | |
| Floating-point performance | 5,914 gflops | 1,882 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2816 | 896 |
| Stream Processors | 2816 | |
| Texture fill rate | 184.8 GTexel / s | 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 2,080 million |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 275 mm | 183 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 512 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 390X with others
AMDRadeon R9 390X vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 390X vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
AMDRadeon R9 390X vs
NVIDIATesla T4
AMDRadeon R9 390X vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200
AMDRadeon R9 390X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
AMDRadeon R9 390X vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile
