NVIDIA Quadro P5200 vs AMD Radeon R9 390X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5200 and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1569 MHz vs 1050 MHz
  • 1511.9x more texture fill rate: 279.4 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 275 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1050 MHz
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15910 vs 11675
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15910 vs 11675
  • Around 47% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6252 vs 4242
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 February 2018 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed 1569 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Texture fill rate 279.4 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 275 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1050 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15910 vs 11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15910 vs 11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6252 vs 4242

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X

  • Around 10% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2560
Pipelines 2816 vs 2560

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15910
11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15910
11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
6252
4242
Name NVIDIA Quadro P5200 AMD Radeon R9 390X
Geekbench - OpenCL 44354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15910 11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15910 11675
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6252 4242
PassMark - G3D Mark 9395
PassMark - G2D Mark 821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 114.288
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2911.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 10.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 118.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 683.568

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 AMD Radeon R9 390X

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 2.0
Code name GP104 Grenada
Launch date 21 February 2018 18 June 2015
Place in performance rating 271 268
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $429

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1569 MHz 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 1316 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 279.4 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 139.7 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 8.940 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 2816
Pixel fill rate 111.7 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 279.4 GTexel/s 184.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt 275 Watt
Transistor count 7200 million 6,200 million
Compute units 44
Floating-point performance 5,914 gflops
Stream Processors 2816

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Laptop size Large
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 275 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan
Mantle

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 230.4 GB/s 384 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 512 bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) 1050 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore