NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 785.7x more texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1050 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9765 vs 9363
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 114.288
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 vs 10.947
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 118.411
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 vs 683.568
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 vs 11675
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 vs 11675
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 275 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1050 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 vs 9363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 vs 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 vs 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 vs 118.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 vs 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 vs 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 vs 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Around 10% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2560
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 vs 493
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 vs 2138.158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2816 vs 2560 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 vs 493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 vs 2138.158 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 | 9363 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 | 819 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 2911.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 118.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GA106 | Grenada |
| Place in performance rating | 272 | 269 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 18 June 2015 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $429 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2816 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 6,200 million |
| Compute units | 44 | |
| Floating-point performance | 5,914 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 512 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1050 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
