AMD Radeon R9 M270X vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M270X and AMD Radeon R7 260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M270X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3485
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3485

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X

• Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
• Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
• Around 28% better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3192 vs 1204
• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 523 vs 306

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M270X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1204 3192
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	306 523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3485
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3361 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3361 3358

Compare specifications (specs)