AMD Radeon R9 M270X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M270X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M270X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3657
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3657
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 March 2014 vs 8 November 2013 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3347 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 86% higher texture fill rate: 89.26 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 768
- Around 39% better floating-point performance: 2,142 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3699 vs 1204
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 557 vs 306
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 89.26 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,142 gflops vs 1,536 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3699 vs 1204 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 557 vs 306 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M270X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M270X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1204 | 3699 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 306 | 557 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3347 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.986 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 826.477 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.362 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.269 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 55.394 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6030 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6030 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M270X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Venus | GK104 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 21 March 2014 | 8 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 612 | 613 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 2,142 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 89.26 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M270X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M270X vs
ATIRadeon E2400
AMDRadeon R9 M270X vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4270 IGP
AMDRadeon R9 M270X vs
AMDRadeon R7 260X
AMDRadeon R9 M270X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
AMDRadeon R9 M270X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560
AMDRadeon R9 M270X vs
NVIDIAT600 Mobile
