AMD Radeon R9 M275 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1900

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275 and ATI Mobility Radeon X1900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R9 M275

ATI Mobility Radeon X1900

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
2.3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 400 MHz
2.3x more boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 400 MHz
7.7x more texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
17.8x more pipelines: 640 vs 36
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
4.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 960 MHz
8.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1115 vs 135
Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 287
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1717 vs 1398
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1717 vs 1398

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	28 January 2014 vs 11 January 2007
Core clock speed	900 MHz vs 400 MHz
Boost clock speed	925 MHz vs 400 MHz
Texture fill rate	37 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 36
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 80 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 960 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1115 vs 135
PassMark - G2D Mark	569 vs 287
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1717 vs 1398
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1717 vs 1398

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X1900

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1115

135

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

569

287

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1717

1398

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1717

1398

Name	AMD Radeon R9 M275	ATI Mobility Radeon X1900
PassMark - G3D Mark	1115	135
PassMark - G2D Mark	569	287
Geekbench - OpenCL	9231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	28.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	313.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	34.381
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	121.685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1717	1398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1717	1398

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 M275	ATI Mobility Radeon X1900
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	R500
Code name	Venus	M68
Launch date	28 January 2014	11 January 2007
Launch price (MSRP)	$799.99
Place in performance rating	1005	1008
Price now	$699.99
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	3.01
Technical info
Boost clock speed	925 MHz	400 MHz
Core clock speed	900 MHz	400 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,184 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	80 nm
Pipelines	640	36
Texture fill rate	37 GTexel / s	4.8 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,500 million	384 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size	large	large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	9.0c
OpenGL	4.5	2.0
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	64 GB / s	30.72 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	470 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	960 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	256
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
Powerplay 6.0