AMD Radeon R9 M275 vs NVIDIA Quadro4 980 XGL
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275 and NVIDIA Quadro4 980 XGL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 15.4x more texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 6.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 223x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1115 vs 5
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 181
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 January 2014 vs 12 November 2002 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1115 vs 5 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 vs 181 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro4 980 XGL
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M275 | NVIDIA Quadro4 980 XGL |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1115 | 5 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 181 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9231 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.064 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 313.463 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.206 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.381 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1717 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M275 | NVIDIA Quadro4 980 XGL | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kelvin |
| Code name | Venus | NV28 A2 |
| Launch date | 28 January 2014 | 12 November 2002 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 993 | 990 |
| Price now | $699.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | |
| Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 10.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
