AMD Radeon R9 M275X vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275X and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 6.2x more texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 640 vs 80
- 9.9x better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 120 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 7.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1700 vs 236
- 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11041 vs 2112
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1705 vs 1679
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1705 vs 1679
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 January 2014 vs 7 January 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 750 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops vs 120 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 vs 236 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11041 vs 2112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1705 vs 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1705 vs 1679 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1247 vs 1228
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1247 vs 1228
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1247 vs 1228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1247 vs 1228 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M275X | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 | 236 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | 362 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11041 | 2112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.109 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 283.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.187 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.407 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3265 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1228 | 1247 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1705 | 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3265 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1228 | 1247 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1705 | 1679 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M275X | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Venus | Park |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 28 January 2014 | 7 January 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1066 | 1069 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 120 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 292 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2, GDDR2, DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M275X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5300
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
ATIRadeon X850 PRO
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5470
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
NVIDIAQuadro 4000
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M275X vs
IntelIris Graphics 540
