AMD Radeon R9 M275X vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275X and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 89% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 475 MHz
• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 15.2 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 486.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1700 vs 1475
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11041 vs 5030
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.109 vs 13.345
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.187 vs 1.552
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.837 vs 20.453
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.407 vs 39.651
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3265 vs 2079
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3265 vs 2079

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000

• 2.5x more memory clock speed: 2808 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 380 vs 362
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 306.122 vs 283.116
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3472 vs 1228
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1705
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3472 vs 1228
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1705

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1700 1475
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	362 380
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11041 5030
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.109 13.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	283.116 306.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.187 1.552
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.837 20.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	91.407 39.651
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3265 2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1228 3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3265 2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1228 3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705 3350

Compare specifications (specs)