AMD Radeon R9 M280X vs AMD Radeon R9 M275X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M280X and AMD Radeon R9 M275X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M280X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 56 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
- Around 51% better floating-point performance: 1,792 gflops vs 1,184 gflops
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41708 vs 11041
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 1228
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 1228
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1705
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1705
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 February 2015 vs 28 January 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s vs 37 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops vs 1,184 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41708 vs 11041 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 1228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 1228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1705 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 247
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1700 vs 814
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 vs 247 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1700 vs 814 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M280X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M280X | AMD Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41708 | 11041 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 1228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 1228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 1705 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | 362 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 814 | 1700 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.109 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 283.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.187 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 33.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 91.407 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3265 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3265 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M280X | AMD Radeon R9 M275X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Saturn | Venus |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series |
| Launch date | 5 February 2015 | 28 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 658 | 1059 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s | 37 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,500 million |
| Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | Not Listed | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | Not Listed |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory type | Not Listed | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M280X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M280X vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200
AMDRadeon R9 M280X vs
AMDFirePro D300
AMDRadeon R9 M280X vs
AMDRadeon R7 250X
AMDRadeon R9 M280X vs
AMDFirePro W6150M
AMDRadeon R9 M280X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
AMDRadeon R9 M280X vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
