AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M290X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M290X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 170 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24008 vs 14380
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.022 vs 41.336
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.62 vs 4.121
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 77.584 vs 58.14
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 267.307 vs 156.419

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 109.8 GTexel / s vs 72 GTexel / s
• Around 5% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1280
• Around 14% better floating-point performance: 2,634 gflops vs 2,304 gflops
• 5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5328 vs 3282
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 575 vs 426
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1351.496 vs 936.497
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2581
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2526
• Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2581
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2526

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M290X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3282 5328
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	426 575
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	24008 14380
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	51.022 41.336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	936.497 1351.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.62 4.121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	77.584 58.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	267.307 156.419
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2581 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2526 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2581 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2526 3357

Compare specifications (specs)