AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 5.5x more texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel / s vs 19.7 billion / sec
- 7.1x more pipelines: 2048 vs 288
- 5.6x better floating-point performance: 3,482 gflops vs 616.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 5448 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2852 vs 732
- 6.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7037 vs 1112
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 November 2014 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s vs 19.7 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 288 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops vs 616.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1536 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5448 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2852 vs 732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7037 vs 1112 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 15.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 732 vs 46
- 8.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1112 vs 125.7
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 732 vs 46 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1112 vs 125.7 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.778 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1285.141 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.839 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.347 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 321.767 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2852 | 732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 46 | 732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7037 | 1112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 125.7 | 1112 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1953 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Amethyst | GF104 |
| Launch date | 23 November 2014 | 3 September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 898 | 900 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops | 616.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 288 |
| Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s | 19.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 174.3 GB / s | 60.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5448 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition with others
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
ATIRadeon HD 4200
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470M
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
