AMD Radeon R9 M360 vs AMD FirePro M5950

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M360 and AMD FirePro M5950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M360

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 725 MHz
• Around 70% higher texture fill rate: 29.6 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
• Around 7% higher pipelines: 512 vs 480
• Around 36% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1807 vs 1314
• 7.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8200 vs 1135
• 16.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.479 vs 1.199
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 575.773 vs 323.699
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.902 vs 0.535
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.15 vs 16.137
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.811 vs 66.638
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2801 vs 1528
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2801 vs 1528

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5950

• 3.2x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 574 vs 412
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 1623
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 1623

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M360
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5950

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1807 1314
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	412 574
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8200 1135
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.479 1.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	575.773 323.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.902 0.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.15 16.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	87.811 66.638
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2801 1528
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1623 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2801 1528
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1623 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3354

Compare specifications (specs)