AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 26% better floating-point performance: 1,024 gflops vs 812.5 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 900x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9620 vs 4493
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.151 vs 12.582
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 516.994 vs 364.463
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.321 vs 1.254
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.932 vs 18.386
- 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 111.138 vs 23.499
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2862 vs 2663
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2862 vs 2663
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 27 November 2013 |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops vs 812.5 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9620 vs 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 vs 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 vs 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 vs 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 vs 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 vs 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 vs 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 vs 2663 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 32 GTexel / s
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 1548
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 350
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 1667
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 1667
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 32 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 vs 1548 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 vs 350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 1667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 vs 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 1667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 vs 3326 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1548 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9620 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1667 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3326 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1667 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tropo | GK106 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 27 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1002 | 1003 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $144.81 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |