AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 350 vs 291
• Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9620 vs 7252
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.151 vs 8.832
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.321 vs 0.935
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.932 vs 19.952
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 111.138 vs 43.535

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 863 MHz vs 800 MHz
• Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• Around 29% better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2014 vs 1548
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 vs 516.994
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 2862
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 vs 1667
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 2862
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 vs 1667

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1548 2014
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	350 291
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9620 7252
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.151 8.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	516.994 520.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.321 0.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.932 19.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.138 43.535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2862 3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1667 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3326 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2862 3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1667 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3326 3333

Compare specifications (specs)