AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 26% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,024 gflops versus 812.5 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 900x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9620 versus 4493
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.151 versus 12.582
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 516.994 versus 364.463
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.321 versus 1.254
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.932 versus 18.386
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 111.138 versus 23.499
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2862 versus 2663
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2862 versus 2663
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 27 November 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,024 gflops versus 812.5 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9620 versus 4493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 versus 12.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 versus 364.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 versus 1.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 versus 18.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 versus 23.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 versus 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 versus 2663 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Environ 37% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 6% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 33.9 billion / sec versus 32 GTexel / s
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 versus 1548
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 versus 350
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 1667
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 1667
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 775 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec versus 32 GTexel / s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 versus 1548 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 versus 350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 versus 1667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 3326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 versus 1667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 3326 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1548 | 1749 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 | 368 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9620 | 4493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 | 12.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 | 364.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 | 1.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 | 18.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 | 23.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1667 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3326 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 | 2663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1667 | 3478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 | 3332 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Tropo | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 27 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1002 | 1003 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $144.81 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,024 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3000
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs
ATIFireGL T2-128
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX
