AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- 2.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 350 versus 291
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9620 versus 7252
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.151 versus 8.832
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.321 versus 0.935
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.932 versus 19.952
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 111.138 versus 43.535
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 versus 291 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9620 versus 7252 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 versus 8.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 versus 0.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 versus 19.952 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 versus 43.535 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 863 MHz versus 800 MHz
- Environ 73% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 55.23 GTexel / s versus 32 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 640
- Environ 29% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,326 gflops versus 1,024 gflops
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2014 versus 1548
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 versus 516.994
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 versus 2862
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3275 versus 1667
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 versus 2862
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3275 versus 1667
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 775 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 863 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55.23 GTexel / s versus 32 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,326 gflops versus 1,024 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2014 versus 1548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 versus 516.994 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 versus 2862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3275 versus 1667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 versus 3326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 versus 2862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3275 versus 1667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 versus 3326 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1548 | 2014 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 350 | 291 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9620 | 7252 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.151 | 8.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 516.994 | 520.747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.321 | 0.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.932 | 19.952 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 111.138 | 43.535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2862 | 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1667 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3326 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2862 | 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1667 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3326 | 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Tropo | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 30 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1002 | 1005 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,024 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32 GTexel / s | 55.23 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M370X Mac Edition avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3000
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs
ATIFireGL T2-128
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 765M
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650
AMDRadeon R9 M370X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX
