AMD Radeon R9 M375 vs NVIDIA GeForce 830M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375 and NVIDIA GeForce 830M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 166 vs 134
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10236 vs 4163
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.048 vs 16.955
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 272.547 vs 156.544
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.024 vs 1.013
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.994 vs 17.81
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 142.872 vs 67.443
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2227 vs 1729
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2227 vs 1729

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830M

• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1015 MHz
• Around 64% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1005 vs 980
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3589 vs 1850
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2112
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3589 vs 1850
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2112

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 830M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	980 1005
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	166 134
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10236 4163
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.048 16.955
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	272.547 156.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.024 1.013
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.994 17.81
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	142.872 67.443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1850 3589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2112 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1850 3589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2112 3352

Compare specifications (specs)