AMD Radeon R7 M260X vs AMD Radeon R9 M375

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260X and AMD Radeon R9 M375 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 988 vs 973
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3158 vs 2112
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3158 vs 2112
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 6 December 2015 vs 5 May 2015
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 988 vs 973
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3158 vs 2112
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3158 vs 2112

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375

  • Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 620 MHz
  • Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1015 MHz vs 715 MHz
  • 2.4x more texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
  • 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
  • Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10235 vs 5753
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2227 vs 1893
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 vs 1775
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2227 vs 1893
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 vs 1775
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 620 MHz
Boost clock speed 1015 MHz vs 715 MHz
Texture fill rate 40.6 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 384
Floating-point performance 1,299 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
Memory clock speed 1100 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 10235 vs 5753
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2227 vs 1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1850 vs 1775
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2227 vs 1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1850 vs 1775

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M375

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
988
973
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
161
161
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5753
10235
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1893
2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1775
1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3158
2112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1893
2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1775
1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3158
2112
Name AMD Radeon R7 M260X AMD Radeon R9 M375
PassMark - G3D Mark 988 973
PassMark - G2D Mark 161 161
Geekbench - OpenCL 5753 10235
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1893 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1775 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3158 2112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1893 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1775 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3158 2112
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 29.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 272.547
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.994
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 142.872

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 M260X AMD Radeon R9 M375

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Opal Tropo
Design AMD Radeon R7 200 Series AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date 6 December 2015 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 1230 1231
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 715 MHz 1015 MHz
Compute units 6 10
Core clock speed 620 MHz 1000 MHz
Floating-point performance 549.1 gflops 1,299 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 640
Texture fill rate 17.16 GTexel / s 40.6 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 1,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 12
Mantle
OpenCL 2.0 Not Listed
OpenGL 4.3 4.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB/s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz 1100 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PCIe 3.0
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
Zero Core
ZeroCore
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
Enduro