AMD Radeon R9 M375 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 2.5x more texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 16.1 billion / sec
• 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 518.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10235 vs 4119
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.048 vs 11.121
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.024 vs 1.105
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.994 vs 18.548
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 142.872 vs 32.965
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2227 vs 1699
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2227 vs 1699

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1216 vs 973
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 258 vs 161
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 391.548 vs 272.547
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2837 vs 1850
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 2112
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2837 vs 1850
• Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 2112

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	973 1216
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	161 258
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10235 4119
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.048 11.121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	272.547 391.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.024 1.105
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.994 18.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	142.872 32.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 1699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1850 2837
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2112 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 1699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1850 2837
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2112 3349

Compare specifications (specs)