AMD Radeon R9 M375X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 14% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 810 MHz
  • Around 90% higher pipelines: 640 vs 336
  • Around 19% better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 17 May 2011
Core clock speed 925 MHz vs 810 MHz
Pipelines 640 vs 336
Floating-point performance 1,299 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

  • Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 45.4 GTexel / s vs 40.6 GTexel / s
  • 3.6x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
  • Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2755 vs 1808
  • Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 343
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3754 vs 3548
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3754 vs 3548
  • Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9102 vs 8320
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 1333
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 1333
  • Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 2185
  • Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 2185
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 45.4 GTexel / s vs 40.6 GTexel / s
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2755 vs 1808
PassMark - G2D Mark 430 vs 343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3754 vs 3548
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3754 vs 3548
Geekbench - OpenCL 9102 vs 8320
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3667 vs 1333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3667 vs 1333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3332 vs 2185
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3332 vs 2185

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1808
2755
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
343
430
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3548
3754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3548
3754
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8320
9102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1333
3667
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1333
3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2185
3332
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2185
3332
Name AMD Radeon R9 M375X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
PassMark - G3D Mark 1808 2755
PassMark - G2D Mark 343 430
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3548 3754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3548 3754
Geekbench - OpenCL 8320 9102
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1333 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1333 3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2185 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2185 3332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 25.82
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 623.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.201
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 62.233
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 M375X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name Tropo GF114
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date 5 May 2015 17 May 2011
Place in performance rating 874 877
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $199
Price now $353.59
Value for money (0-100) 10.61

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1015 MHz
Compute units 10
Core clock speed 925 MHz 810 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,299 gflops 1,088.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 640 336
Texture fill rate 40.6 GTexel / s 45.4 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,500 million 1,950 million
Maximum GPU temperature 99 °C
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Eyefinity
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 16x PCI-E 2.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 8.25" (21 cm)
SLI options 2-Way
Supplementary power connectors Two 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4 4.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 72 GB / s 128.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1125 MHz 4000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
CUDA
SLI