AMD Radeon R9 M375X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R9 M375X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375X

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 14% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 810 MHz
Around 90% higher pipelines: 640 vs 336
Around 19% better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB

Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 17 May 2011
Core clock speed	925 MHz vs 810 MHz
Pipelines	640 vs 336
Floating-point performance	1,299 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 45.4 GTexel / s vs 40.6 GTexel / s
3.6x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2756 vs 1808
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 433 vs 343
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3754 vs 3548
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3754 vs 3548
Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8351 vs 8103
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 1333
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 1333
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 2185
Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 2185

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	45.4 GTexel / s vs 40.6 GTexel / s
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2756 vs 1808
PassMark - G2D Mark	433 vs 343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3754 vs 3548
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3754 vs 3548
Geekbench - OpenCL	8351 vs 8103
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3667 vs 1333
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3667 vs 1333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3332 vs 2185
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3332 vs 2185

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1808

2756

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

343

433

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3548

3754

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3548

3754

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8103

8351

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1333

3667

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1333

3667

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2185

3332

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2185

3332

Name	AMD Radeon R9 M375X	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
PassMark - G3D Mark	1808	2756
PassMark - G2D Mark	343	433
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3548	3754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3548	3754
Geekbench - OpenCL	8103	8351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1333	3667
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1333	3667
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2185	3332
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2185	3332
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		25.82
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		623.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.201
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		30.402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		62.233
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R9 M375X	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Tropo	GF114
Design	AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch date	5 May 2015	17 May 2011
Place in performance rating	876	879
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$199
Price now		$353.59
Value for money (0-100)		10.61
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1015 MHz
Compute units	10
Core clock speed	925 MHz	810 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,299 gflops	1,088.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	640	336
Texture fill rate	40.6 GTexel / s	45.4 GTexel / s
Transistor count	1,500 million	1,950 million
Maximum GPU temperature		99 °C
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		150 Watt
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Eyefinity
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	16x PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		8.25" (21 cm)
SLI options		2-Way
Supplementary power connectors		Two 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
Mantle
OpenCL	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.4	4.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	72 GB / s	128.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
CUDA
SLI