AMD Radeon R9 M375X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M375X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 914 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1015 MHz vs 993 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 39.72 GTexel / s
- Around 2% better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 1,271 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 320 vs 271
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3548 vs 1973
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3548 vs 1973
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 914 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1015 MHz vs 993 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 40.6 GTexel / s vs 39.72 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops vs 1,271 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 320 vs 271 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3548 vs 1973 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3548 vs 1973 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2593 vs 1715
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10220 vs 8255
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2188 vs 1333
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2188 vs 1333
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3289 vs 2185
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3289 vs 2185
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2593 vs 1715 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10220 vs 8255 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2188 vs 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2188 vs 1333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3289 vs 2185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3289 vs 2185 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M375X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M375X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1715 | 2593 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 320 | 271 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3548 | 1973 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3548 | 1973 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8255 | 10220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1333 | 2188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1333 | 2188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2185 | 3289 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2185 | 3289 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M375X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tropo | GM107 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 893 | 894 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1015 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 914 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,299 gflops | 1,271 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 40.6 GTexel / s | 39.72 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M375X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1450
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950A
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M375X vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX110
