AMD Radeon R9 M380 versus NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M380 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M380
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 900 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 23% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,536 gflops versus 1,244 gflops
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2765 versus 2720
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 versus 423
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12565 versus 6666
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.701 versus 18.462
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.907 versus 427.88
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.618 versus 1.899
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.878 versus 23.742
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 versus 61.965
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 1 March 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops versus 1,244 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2765 versus 2720 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 versus 423 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12565 versus 6666 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 versus 18.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 versus 427.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 versus 1.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 versus 23.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 versus 61.965 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- Environ 8% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 51.84 GTexel / s versus 48 GTexel / s
- 3.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5616 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 versus 3688
- 6.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 versus 536
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 versus 2855
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 versus 3688
- 6.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 versus 536
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 versus 2855
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 51.84 GTexel / s versus 48 GTexel / s |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5616 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 versus 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 versus 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 versus 2855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 versus 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 versus 536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 versus 2855 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2765 | 2720 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 509 | 423 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12565 | 6666 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.701 | 18.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.907 | 427.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.618 | 1.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.878 | 23.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.051 | 61.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3688 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 536 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2855 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3688 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 536 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2855 | 3321 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M380 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Strato | GK106 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 1 March 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 876 | 878 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,269 | |
| Prix maintenant | $225.65 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,536 gflops | 1,244 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48 GTexel / s | 51.84 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 2,540 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB / s | 134.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz | 5616 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 M380 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 445M
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
NVIDIAP106-090
AMDRadeon R9 M380 vs
AMDRadeon 540
