AMD Radeon R9 M395X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M395X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M395X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 208.3x more memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 733 vs 630
• Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27705 vs 23870
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.367 vs 62.027
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 71.057 vs 36.842
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 413.329 vs 215.546

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 723 MHz
• 2x more texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 92.54 GTexel / s
• Around 31% higher pipelines: 2688 vs 2048
• Around 59% better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8190 vs 5195
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1218.137 vs 799.421
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.835 vs 5.718
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10176 vs 7365
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2154
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10176 vs 7365
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2154

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M395X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5195 8190
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	733 630
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	27705 23870
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.367 62.027
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	799.421 1218.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.718 5.835
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	71.057 36.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	413.329 215.546
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7365 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2154 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7365 10176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2154 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3356

Compare specifications (specs)