AMD Radeon R9 M470 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M470 and NVIDIA Tesla C2075 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 57% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
  • Around 71% higher pipelines: 768 vs 448
  • Around 49% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
  • 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47924 vs 10563
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 May 2016 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 575 MHz
Texture fill rate 48 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 448
Floating-point performance 1,536 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 47924 vs 10563

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075

  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 2331
  • Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 428 vs 307
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 1804
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 1804
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1674
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1674
Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3017 vs 2331
PassMark - G2D Mark 428 vs 307
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3705 vs 1804
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3705 vs 1804
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 vs 1674
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 vs 1674

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M470
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2075

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2331
3017
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
307
428
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
47924
10563
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1804
3705
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1804
3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1674
3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1674
3346
Name AMD Radeon R9 M470 NVIDIA Tesla C2075
PassMark - G3D Mark 2331 3017
PassMark - G2D Mark 307 428
Geekbench - OpenCL 47924 10563
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1804 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1804 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1674 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1674 3346
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 930.623
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 45.924
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 93.747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2825

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 M470 NVIDIA Tesla C2075

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name Strato GF110
Launch date 15 May 2016 25 July 2011
Place in performance rating 765 767
Type Laptop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 900 MHz 575 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,536 gflops 1,030.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 768 448
Texture fill rate 48 GTexel / s 32.2 GTexel / s
Transistor count 2,080 million 3,000 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 247 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
Length 248 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 96 GB / s 144.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz 3000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DirectCompute 5.0