AMD Radeon R9 M470 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M470 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 732 MHz
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 41.0 GTexel / s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 768 vs 448
- Around 17% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 1,311.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1280 MB
- Around 58% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 3800 MHz
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 29 November 2011 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 732 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s vs 41.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops vs 1,311.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1280 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 3800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2133 vs 1804
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2133 vs 1804
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 1674
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 1674
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2133 vs 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2133 vs 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 1674 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M470
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M470 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2331 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47924 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1804 | 2133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1804 | 2133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4197 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M470 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Strato | GF110 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 29 November 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 765 | 766 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 732 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 1,311.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 41.0 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,000 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1280 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 |