AMD Radeon R9 M470 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M470 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47924 vs 11272
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 6 September 2012 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47924 vs 11272 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 48 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 960 vs 768
- Around 29% better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3999 vs 2331
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 307
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 1804
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 1804
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 1674
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec vs 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops vs 1,536 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3999 vs 2331 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 vs 307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 1674 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M470
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M470 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2331 | 3999 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 478 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47924 | 11272 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1804 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1804 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1674 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1674 | 3365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M470 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Strato | GK106 |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 6 September 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 769 | 772 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |