AMD Radeon R9 M470 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M470 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 1000x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
  • 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47924 vs 11272
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 May 2016 vs 6 September 2012
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 47924 vs 11272

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

  • Around 9% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 48 GTexel / s
  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 960 vs 768
  • Around 29% better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
  • Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3999 vs 2331
  • Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 307
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 1804
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 1804
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 1674
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 1674
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 980 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate 78.4 billion / sec vs 48 GTexel / s
Pipelines 960 vs 768
Floating-point performance 1,981 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3999 vs 2331
PassMark - G2D Mark 478 vs 307
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3690 vs 1804
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3690 vs 1804
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3365 vs 1674
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3365 vs 1674

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M470
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2331
3999
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
307
478
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
47924
11272
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1804
3690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1804
3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1674
3365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1674
3365
Name AMD Radeon R9 M470 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
PassMark - G3D Mark 2331 3999
PassMark - G2D Mark 307 478
Geekbench - OpenCL 47924 11272
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1804 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1804 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1674 3365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1674 3365
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 30.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 705.293
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 62.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3581
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1307

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 M470 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 Kepler
Code name Strato GK106
Launch date 15 May 2016 6 September 2012
Place in performance rating 769 772
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $229
Price now $349.99
Value for money (0-100) 14.35

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz 1033 MHz
Core clock speed 900 MHz 980 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,536 gflops 1,981 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 960
Texture fill rate 48 GTexel / s 78.4 billion / sec
Transistor count 2,080 million 2,540 million
CUDA cores 960
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 140 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 9.5" (24.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 96 GB / s 144.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz 6.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DirectCompute 5.0
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA