NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M470
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 M470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3242 vs 2331
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 318 vs 307
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2645 vs 1804
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1674
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2645 vs 1804
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1093 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3242 vs 2331 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 318 vs 307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 vs 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 vs 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1674 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 10% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47924 vs 10582
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops vs 1,399 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47924 vs 10582 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M470
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M470 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3242 | 2331 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 318 | 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10582 | 47924 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.297 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 | 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 | 1804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1674 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M470 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Strato |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 767 | 769 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1093 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,399 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 43.72 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,080 million |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DirectCompute 5.0 |