AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon R9 370X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 370X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5600 MHz
| Launch date | 8 August 2016 vs 27 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 82.4 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 896
- 1198.6x better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25659 vs 17592
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 vs 55
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1139.703 vs 970.421
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 vs 4.656
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 vs 76.881
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 vs 237.944
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 6821
- 72.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 115.4
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s vs 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 896 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 vs 17592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 vs 55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 vs 970.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 vs 4.656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 vs 76.881 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 vs 237.944 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 vs 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 vs 115.4 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370X
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 370X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4101 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17592 | 25659 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 | 65.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 | 1139.703 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 | 5.39 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 | 88.44 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 | 337.583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6821 | 8393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 115.4 | 8393 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 370X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Baffin | Trinidad |
| Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 8 August 2016 | 27 August 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $199 |
| Place in performance rating | 546 | 547 |
| Price now | $179.50 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 33.86 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Compute units | 14 | |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2.2 TFLOPs | 2,637 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1280 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Texture fill rate | 67.2 GTexel / s | 82.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | 221 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 179.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) with others
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
ATIRadeon X700 PRO
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4830
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGRID K280Q
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
