AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) versus AMD Radeon R9 370X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 370X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1090 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1030 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 180 Watt
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 5600 MHz
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 versus 27 August 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1030 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 5600 MHz |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Environ 23% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 82.4 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 43% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 896
- 1198.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,637 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 25659 versus 17592
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 versus 55
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1139.703 versus 970.421
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 versus 4.656
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 versus 76.881
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 versus 237.944
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 versus 6821
- 72.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 versus 115.4
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s versus 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 896 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops versus 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 versus 17592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 versus 55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 versus 970.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 versus 4.656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 versus 76.881 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 versus 237.944 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 versus 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 versus 115.4 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370X
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 370X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4101 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 577 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17592 | 25659 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55 | 65.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 970.421 | 1139.703 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.656 | 5.39 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.881 | 88.44 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 237.944 | 337.583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6821 | 8393 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 115.4 | 8393 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1730 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R9 370X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Baffin | Trinidad |
| Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
| Date de sortie | 8 August 2016 | 27 August 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $86 | $199 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 546 | 547 |
| Prix maintenant | $179.50 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 33.86 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 14 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1090 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2.2 TFLOPs | 2,637 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1280 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.2 GTexel / s | 82.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 2,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 170 mm | 221 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 179.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
ATIRadeon X700 PRO
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4830
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGRID K280Q
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
