AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 954 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 993 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 122 Watt
- 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65217 vs 15023
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1728 vs 1611
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.048 vs 46.273
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 969.655 vs 777.677
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.655 vs 3.914
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.807 vs 38.196
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 239.111 vs 82.511
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 August 2016 vs 12 March 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 954 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 993 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 vs 15023 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1728 vs 1611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 vs 46.273 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 969.655 vs 777.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.655 vs 3.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.807 vs 38.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 239.111 vs 82.511 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Around 92% higher texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 66.08 GTexel / s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 896
- 1386.4x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s vs 66.08 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 896 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 | 15023 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1728 | 1611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 | 46.273 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 969.655 | 777.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.655 | 3.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.807 | 38.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 239.111 | 82.511 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3818 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Baffin | GK104 |
| Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 8 August 2016 | 12 March 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | |
| Place in performance rating | 772 | 775 |
| Price now | $179.50 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 26.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Compute units | 14 | |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2.2 TFLOPs | 3,050 gflops |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1536 |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
| Texture fill rate | 66.08 GTexel / s | 127.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| VGA | ||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) with others
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon E8950
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs
IntelUHD Graphics 750
