AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 771 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 94% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
  • 5.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65217 vs 11427
  • 9.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55 vs 5.972
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 970.421 vs 355.305
  • 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.656 vs 1.022
  • 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.881 vs 15.706
  • 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 237.944 vs 34.772
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 August 2016 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed 1090 MHz vs 771 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 70 Watt vs 100 Watt
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 65217 vs 11427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 55 vs 5.972
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 970.421 vs 355.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.656 vs 1.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 76.881 vs 15.706
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 237.944 vs 34.772

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

  • Around 49% higher texture fill rate: 98.69 GTexel / s vs 66.08 GTexel / s
  • Around 71% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 896
  • 1076.8x better floating-point performance: 2,369 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
Texture fill rate 98.69 GTexel / s vs 66.08 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1536 vs 896
Floating-point performance 2,369 gflops vs 2.2 TFLOPs
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 2 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
65217
11427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
55
5.972
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
970.421
355.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.656
1.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
76.881
15.706
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
237.944
34.772
Name AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Geekbench - OpenCL 65217 11427
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1728
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 55 5.972
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 970.421 355.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.656 1.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 76.881 15.706
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 237.944 34.772
PassMark - G3D Mark 3191
PassMark - G2D Mark 350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3362

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Kepler
Code name Baffin GK104
Design Radeon RX 400 Series
GCN generation 4th Gen
Launch date 8 August 2016 23 July 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $86
Place in performance rating 772 775
Price now $179.50 $309.99
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100) 26.72 13.80

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz
Compute units 14
Core clock speed 1090 MHz 771 MHz
Floating-point performance 2.2 TFLOPs 2,369 gflops
GPU Power 35-48 Watt
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 896 1536
Stream Processors 896
Texture fill rate 66.08 GTexel / s 98.69 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 70 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
VGA
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bridgeless CrossFire
Interface MXM-B (3.0) MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size large large
Recommended system power (PSU) 400 Watt

API support

DirectX 12 12
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model 5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 112 GB/s 115.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz 3600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 4K Support
PowerTune
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus